Julian Mehnle wrote:
I never really cared about how positional modifiers worked
in Sender-ID, but I always thought that this was the way
they worked. Seems the S-ID guys weren't _that_ intelligent...
Meng, Mark, me, and others, here on this list, summer 2004.
William's counter-proposal was less optimal and confusing like
hell for non-trivial cases. Greg's macro-idea is a feasible
alternative.
"scope=-pra include:mydomain.esp.com scope=+pra -all" )
This lets you add and delete scope values, instead of just
setting them.
This is an interesting variant I hadn't thought of before.
The elaborated version of William's idea, IIRC it doesn't work,
and that was the point where "consensus positional" was decreed
by the marid-protocol editor (Mark, seconded by me). JFTR, bye
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com