Stuart D. Gathman wrote:
1) What are the common localpart coding schemes other than
SRS and SES?
BATV (?) Guessing, and confused by Doug on the ASRG list.
3) Should establishing a standard separator for localpart
signing prefixes be a future goal of SPF
Could make sense if that's something useful for S?S, BATV,
and similar schemes. But I fear that would be only "for
info", you can't just claim a character for interesting
uses of local parts.
It seems too trivial to have its own RFC. Where should
such a standard go?
Informational RfCs would go to the RfC editor or to the
IETF, or you try it via IRTF-ASRG. If it's good for the
interoperability of S?S related stuff it's not "trivial",
nothing's wrong with very short RfCs.
Bye, Frank
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com