"Marc Chametzky" wrote:
My SPF engine also returns PermError for microsoft.com, too.
Why? Is a SPF DNS lookup Limit Other than Recursive Limits?
By the time
I got to the last of the three includes in the main record, I had
already hit 10 DNS-lookup-counted mechanisms.
Main record: 4 (1 mx, 3 includes)
The mx has three A records, so it is a 7 total here.
First include: 3 (2 a, 1 mx)
The MX is repeat of the above, so we have 6 total here.
Second include: 4 (3 a, 1 mx)
The MX has 4 A records, so thats 3+1+4 = 8
Third include: 0
Right, the grand total is 7+6+8 = 21 DNS lookups, 6 redundant lookups which
the DNS client cache will handle, if any.
Unless I got the meaning of the SPF recursive limit wrong, this should not
fail with a PermError. This is not a recursive SPF record. Right?
--
Hector Santos, Santronics Software, Inc.
http://www.santronics.com
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com