-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Scott Kitterman wrote:
This message points to a project policy issue that I think ought to be
discussed and decided on by the council (you knew there had to be a
reason to have another meeting).
Should the SPF project give recognition to patches that the MTA author
has rejected (in this case it's not just this particular patch, but the
idea of patching Postfix internals period).
Noted. I'll bring it up on spf-council tomorrow (Wednesday), together with
the other outstanding issues. (I wanted to do that earlier, but couldn't
due to real life time constraints.)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFExd3mwL7PKlBZWjsRAlFXAJ45APTaZrAS5bUdCgIBuIEhtXdnYQCfVLgI
AxTZuORzb1LD9UnsQ0acOhY=
=XIEd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com