spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

[spf-discuss] Re: Suggestion: SPF record vs. SPF information

2006-11-26 08:20:14
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Alex van den Bogaerdt wrote:
Opinions please:

The words "SPF record" can be confusing.

I suggest we adopt the following:

When we say "SPF record", we mean the DNS resource record type SPF.

When we say "SPF information", we mean "v=spf1 ip4:... -all", in either
an SPF record or a TXT record.

I don't think "SPF information" is a good synonym for "DNS record of RR 
type 'SPF' or 'TXT' with SPF policy information".

I usually use the following terminology:

  * "SPF (sender) policy"
    An abstract list of a domain's sender policy declaration atoms
    according to the SPF standard.

  * "SPF record"
    A DNS record of RR type 'SPF' or 'TXT' carrying an "SPF policy".

  * "SPF-type RR" or "SPF-type DNS record"
    A DNS record of RR type 'SPF' (not 'TXT'!) carrying an "SPF policy".

Eventually the "'TXT' type" meaning of "SPF record" will go away if/when 
another revision of SPF that uses only SPF-type RRs will have become 
dominant over SPFv1.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFabBjwL7PKlBZWjsRAqjLAKC2P2hO0v14hMZsepx7JgK6k3u9vACgtCuQ
jI//OZ5ZBIlgIhOdCVIQuzc=
=UxPl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=735