spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [spf-discuss] Useful SPF results

2006-12-04 18:23:40
On Mon, 4 Dec 2006, Meng Weng Wong wrote:

On Dec 4, 2006, at 2:59 PM, Stuart D. Gathman wrote:

My system depends on extensive whitelists and blacklists.  I can't
use the domain whitelist for a *message* without SPF PASS (because
the message might be forged), and I can't blacklist a *domain*  
without SPF PASS
(because the message might be forged and not actually from that  
domain).


That's technically true, but when do legitimate senders forge  
blacklisted domains?

The problem is that a spam from example.com with SPF neutral does not
let me blacklist example.com with confidence.  Example.com might be
a joe job victim that has yet to publish an SPF record.  You could argue
that I should "blacklist 'em anyway - that'll teach 'em not to publish SPF",
but my clients need to communicate with backward primitives who don't
publish SPF records - or have stupid policies.

-- 
              Stuart D. Gathman <stuart(_at_)bmsi(_dot_)com>
    Business Management Systems Inc.  Phone: 703 591-0911 Fax: 703 591-6154
"Confutatis maledictis, flammis acribus addictis" - background song for
a Microsoft sponsored "Where do you want to go from here?" commercial.

-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=735