spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

[spf-discuss] Re: Verisign and SPF

2006-12-07 15:57:02
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Stuart D. Gathman wrote:
On Thu, 7 Dec 2006, Julian Mehnle wrote:
If they were nice and worked with the community, they might actually
get some system (not necessarily the above) accepted to let them do
the Ad for invalid domain service.

I don't think there is a point in getting rid of the delegation-only
policy for registries.  Registries should delegate and nothing else.

Yeah, any "opt-out" system is going to be resented and blocked.

I think the "opt-in" system of a domain you could auto-redirect to might
get traction.

What problem would it solve?

How would "invalid domains" opt-in?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFeJvLwL7PKlBZWjsRAhtWAJsGwRoiWBJC6Etcz8KJ7gzig1AqEgCg/iTT
ShRU475ryYwjn8Xzwq4aqkU=
=Dfn5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=735

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>