-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Wayne Schlitt wrote:
Stuart D. Gathman writes:
I have updated Errata, and even filled in suggested wording and
rationale.
Why do you assume that the examples are wrong and not the ABNF?
Were the examples changed since draft-mengwong-spf-[01]?
Was the ABNF?
If one was changed, why?
What do most SPF implementations generate?
I agree that this appears to be a problem. I don't agree that the
solution is so obvious that such this should be published as an errata
without answering questions such as above.
Actuall, it looks like most of the stuff on the errata page is bogus,
only the missing ABNF for the 'v' macro looks correct to me.
Not saying that I agree (or disagree) with you, but that's why they are
listed under "Potential errata under discussion in the forums".
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFFip5nwL7PKlBZWjsRApZPAJ9Nonu1vJGEhbu8okRhIsu6MC5aEwCg+jyD
ry2+7b8VfUpJ2V8wPeaY2FY=
=HvA0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=735