-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Stuart D. Gathman wrote:
For the Received-SPF examples, there is clearly a conflict between the
ABNF and the examples. It would certainly be convenient if the examples
were correct and the ABNF wrong. Could you propose a revised ABNF
that would allow the unquoted examples, and would be compatible with
appropriate email standards?
I think Wayne does have a point when saying that the situation needs to be
reviewed more thoroughly. Why would the examples be wrong? Why would the
grammar be wrong? Is the strictness of the grammar (that requires certain
strings to be quoted) necessary or not?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFFiscywL7PKlBZWjsRAkGeAJ4gCCPIerXpVAnSaHK+JGR5Z5J9pwCcC+82
865ZnTFu0/+q66hwcdUJnLU=
=ae8K
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=735