-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Seth Goodman wrote:
I must have been unclear as to what I meant.
"v=spf1 ip4:192.168.0.1 ip4:192.168.0.3 ip4:192.168.0.5 -all"
"v=spf1 192.168.0.1 192.168.0.3 192.168.0.5 -all"
Not wanting to comment on the SPFv3 proposal as such, but... Don't do
that! Don't write proposed SPFv3 syntax using the "v=spf1" tag! This
runs the risk of confusing newbies endlessly!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFFqgCBwL7PKlBZWjsRAtUoAJ9+ePnSPyYt2B5GHLpa+4evJwVTOwCfRia7
PRpSElMLKsldff9lrzpmFUE=
=+uf0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=735