SPF Discuss (date)
January 30, 2007
- Re: [spf-discuss] Finalizing our draft-otis-spf-dos-exploit analysis, william(at)elan.net, 21:16
- [spf-discuss] Finalizing our draft-otis-spf-dos-exploit analysis, Julian Mehnle, 17:23
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF w/SRS, Peter Bowyer, 16:35
- [spf-discuss] Re: SPF w/SRS, Julian Mehnle, 16:30
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF w/SRS, Peter Bowyer, 16:09
- [spf-discuss] Re: Domain reputation system design, Julian Mehnle, 16:04
- [spf-discuss] Re: SPF w/SRS, Julian Mehnle, 15:56
- Re: [spf-discuss]Domain reputation system design, william(at)elan.net, 15:48
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF w/SRS, Dan_Mitton, 15:32
- Re: [spf-discuss]Domain reputation system design, Stuart D. Gathman, 14:38
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF w/SRS, william(at)elan.net, 14:15
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF w/SRS, Dan_Mitton, 14:07
- Re: [spf-discuss]Domain reputation system design, william(at)elan.net, 13:31
- RE: [spf-discuss] Re: Using SPF op=helo for HELO Authorization, Seth Goodman, 11:36
- Re: [spf-discuss]Domain reputation system design, David MacQuigg, 10:37
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Using SPF op=helo for HELO Authorization, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 10:26
- [spf-discuss] Re: Using SPF op=helo for HELO Authorization, Frank Ellermann, 10:05
- [spf-discuss] Re: Domain reputation system design, Julian Mehnle, 04:30
January 29, 2007
- RE: [spf-discuss] SPF basics commentary, Seth Goodman, 23:56
- RE: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF basics commentary, Seth Goodman, 22:57
- RE: [spf-discuss] Using SPF op=helo for HELO Authorization, Seth Goodman, 22:27
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF basics commentary, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 19:01
- RE: [spf-discuss] Using SPF op=helo for HELO Authorization, Seth Goodman, 18:45
- RE: [spf-discuss] SPF basics commentary, Stuart D. Gathman, 18:41
- RE: [spf-discuss] SPF basics commentary, Seth Goodman, 18:37
- Re: [spf-discuss] Domain reputation system design (was: Using SPF op=helo for HELO Authorization), Stuart D. Gathman, 18:34
- RE: [spf-discuss] SPF basics commentary, Seth Goodman, 18:18
- RE: [spf-discuss] SPF basics commentary, Devin Ganger, 18:14
- [spf-discuss] Re: Using SPF op=helo for HELO Authorization, Julian Mehnle, 17:01
- Re: [spf-discuss] Using SPF op=helo for HELO Authorization, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 16:51
- [spf-discuss] Domain reputation system design (was: Using SPF op=helo for HELO Authorization), Julian Mehnle, 16:50
- Re: [spf-discuss] Using SPF op=helo for HELO Authorization, David MacQuigg, 16:49
- RE: [spf-discuss] Using SPF op=helo for HELO Authorization, David MacQuigg, 16:34
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF w/SRS, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 16:29
- Re: [spf-discuss] Using SPF op=helo for HELO Authorization, Stuart D. Gathman, 16:12
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF w/SRS, Stuart D. Gathman, 15:58
- RE: [spf-discuss] Re: Election issue: forwarding problem, Stuart D. Gathman, 15:57
- [spf-discuss] Re: SPF w/SRS, Julian Mehnle, 15:53
- [spf-discuss] 2007 SPF Council Elections - Preliminary Results, william(at)elan.net, 15:53
- RE: [spf-discuss] SPF basics commentary, Stuart D. Gathman, 15:52
- RE: [spf-discuss] SPF basics commentary, Stuart D. Gathman, 15:48
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF w/SRS, Scott Kitterman, 15:31
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF w/SRS, Dan_Mitton, 15:28
- Re: [spf-discuss] Using SPF op=helo for HELO Authorization, David MacQuigg, 15:26
- [spf-discuss] Re: SPF w/SRS, Julian Mehnle, 15:19
- [spf-discuss] SPF w/SRS, Dan_Mitton, 15:14
- RE: [spf-discuss] Re: Election issue: forwarding problem, Michael Deutschmann, 15:09
- [spf-discuss] Re: SPF basics commentary, Julian Mehnle, 14:53
- RE: [spf-discuss] Using SPF op=helo for HELO Authorization, Seth Goodman, 14:50
- Re: Question: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF basics commentary, David MacQuigg, 14:48
- RE: [spf-discuss] SPF basics commentary, Devin Ganger, 14:34
- RE: [spf-discuss] SPF basics commentary, Devin Ganger, 14:14
- Re: [spf-discuss] Using SPF op=helo for HELO Authorization, Stuart D. Gathman, 13:31
- RE: [spf-discuss] SPF basics commentary, Stuart D. Gathman, 13:16
- Question: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF basics commentary, Don Lee, 12:56
- RE: [spf-discuss] SPF basics commentary, Seth Goodman, 12:42
- Re: [spf-discuss] Using SPF op=helo for HELO Authorization, David MacQuigg, 12:39
- RE: [spf-discuss] SPF basics commentary, Seth Goodman, 12:30
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF basics commentary, Terry Fielder, 12:09
- RE: [spf-discuss] Re: Election issue: forwarding problem, Stuart D. Gathman, 12:07
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF basics commentary, Daniel Taylor, 11:51
- RE: [spf-discuss] Re: Election issue: forwarding problem, Seth Goodman, 11:50
- RE: [spf-discuss] SPF basics commentary, Stuart D. Gathman, 11:39
- RE: [spf-discuss] SPF basics commentary, David MacQuigg, 11:19
- Re: [spf-discuss] Using SPF op=helo for HELO Authorization, Stuart D. Gathman, 11:19
- RE: [spf-discuss] SPF basics commentary, Stuart D. Gathman, 11:10
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: How does one distinguish between authorizing MAIL FROM and HELO, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 11:09
- Re: [spf-discuss] Using SPF op=helo for HELO Authorization, David MacQuigg, 11:07
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF basics commentary, Terry Fielder, 11:06
- RE: [spf-discuss] SPF basics commentary, Seth Goodman, 11:03
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF basics commentary, Stuart D. Gathman, 11:02
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF basics commentary, Daniel Taylor, 10:45
- RE: [spf-discuss] SPF basics commentary, Stuart D. Gathman, 10:44
- RE: [spf-discuss] SPF basics commentary, Seth Goodman, 10:43
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF basics commentary, Stuart D. Gathman, 10:42
- RE: [spf-discuss] SPF basics commentary, william(at)elan.net, 10:37
- RE: [spf-discuss] SPF basics commentary, David MacQuigg, 10:25
- [spf-discuss] Re: How does one distinguish between authorizing MAIL FROM and HELO, John A. Martin, 10:24
- RE: [spf-discuss] SPF basics commentary, Stuart D. Gathman, 10:24
- RE: [spf-discuss] SPF basics commentary, Stuart D. Gathman, 10:15
- [spf-discuss] Re: How does one distinguish between authorizing MAIL FROM and HELO, John A. Martin, 10:07
- RE: [spf-discuss] SPF basics commentary, Seth Goodman, 10:01
- RE: [spf-discuss] SPF basics commentary, william(at)elan.net, 09:58
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: How does one distinguish between authorizing MAIL FROM and HELO, Don Lee, 09:56
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF basics commentary, Don Lee, 09:50
- RE: [spf-discuss] SPF basics commentary, william(at)elan.net, 09:50
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: How does one distinguish between authorizing MAIL FROM and HELO, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 08:59
- RE: [spf-discuss] SPF basics commentary, Stuart D. Gathman, 08:55
- [spf-discuss] Re: How does one distinguish between authorizing MAIL FROM and HELO, John A. Martin, 08:35
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF basics commentary, Stuart D. Gathman, 08:30
- RE: [spf-discuss] SPF basics commentary, Dick St.Peters, 08:10
- Re: [spf-discuss] "Packaging" SPF, Scott Kitterman, 05:53
January 28, 2007
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF basics commentary, Devin Ganger, 22:43
- Re: [spf-discuss] "Packaging" SPF, Stuart D. Gathman, 21:49
- RE: [spf-discuss] SPF basics commentary, Stuart D. Gathman, 21:36
- [spf-discuss] Re: Election issue: forwarding problem, Julian Mehnle, 18:18
- RE: [spf-discuss] SPF basics commentary, Don Lee, 17:58
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Election issue: forwarding problem, Michael Deutschmann, 17:46
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: forwarded mail being bounced (by spf check), Lou Katz, 16:58
- [spf-discuss] Re: Election issue: forwarding problem, Julian Mehnle, 15:29
- [spf-discuss] Re: forwarded mail being bounced (by spf check), Julian Mehnle, 15:10
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: How does one distinguish between authorizing MAIL FROM and HELO, Scott Kitterman, 14:49
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Election issue: forwarding problem, Michael Deutschmann, 14:35
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: forwarded mail being bounced (by spf check), Dick St.Peters, 14:29
- [spf-discuss] Re: How does one distinguish between authorizing MAIL FROM and HELO, John A. Martin, 13:59
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: How does one distinguish between authorizing MAIL FROM and HELO, Scott Kitterman, 13:12
- [spf-discuss] Re: How does one distinguish between authorizing MAIL FROM and HELO, John A. Martin, 12:44
- [spf-discuss] Re: forwarded mail being bounced (by spf check), Frank Ellermann, 12:01
- [spf-discuss] Re: SPF basics commentary, Frank Ellermann, 11:17
- Re: [spf-discuss] "Packaging" SPF, Scott Kitterman, 10:18
- Re: [spf-discuss] "Packaging" SPF, Scott Kitterman, 08:26
- [spf-discuss] Re: SPF basics commentary, Julian Mehnle, 07:05
- [spf-discuss] Re: SPF basics commentary, Julian Mehnle, 06:48
- [spf-discuss] Re: forwarded mail being bounced (by spf check), Julian Mehnle, 06:31
- Re: [spf-discuss] "Packaging" SPF, Koen Martens, 05:36
January 27, 2007
- RE: [spf-discuss] SPF basics commentary, Seth Goodman, 22:51
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: forwarded mail being bounced (by spf check), william(at)elan.net, 18:19
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF basics commentary, David MacQuigg, 17:37
- RE: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF basics commentary, Seth Goodman, 17:09
- [spf-discuss] Re: SPF basics commentary, John A. Martin, 16:58
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: forwarded mail being bounced (by spf check), Graham Murray, 14:41
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF basics commentary, David MacQuigg, 14:03
- RE: [spf-discuss] Re: forwarded mail being bounced (by spf check), Seth Goodman, 13:45
- RE: [spf-discuss] SPF basics commentary, Seth Goodman, 13:31
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF basics commentary, Scott Kitterman, 12:55
- [spf-discuss] Re: SPF basics commentary, Don Lee, 12:39
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: forwarded mail being bounced (by spf check), Stuart D. Gathman, 12:34
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF basics commentary, Stuart D. Gathman, 12:26
- [spf-discuss] Re: Election issue: forwarding problem, Frank Ellermann, 12:21
- [spf-discuss] Re: forwarded mail being bounced (by spf check), Frank Ellermann, 12:12
- [spf-discuss] Re: SPF basics commentary, Frank Ellermann, 11:28
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF basics commentary, David MacQuigg, 11:19
- RE: [spf-discuss] Re: forwarded mail being bounced (by spf check), Seth Goodman, 11:03
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Election issue: forwarding problem, David MacQuigg, 10:47
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Election issue: forwarding problem, Stuart D. Gathman, 10:13
- [spf-discuss] SPF basics commentary, Don Lee, 10:05
- [spf-discuss] Re: forwarded mail being bounced (by spf check), Frank Ellermann, 09:43
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Election issue: forwarding problem, David MacQuigg, 04:42
- Re: [spf-discuss] forwarded mail being bounced (by spf check), David MacQuigg, 04:40
January 26, 2007
- [spf-discuss] Re: Election issue: forwarding problem, Julian Mehnle, 19:09
- [spf-discuss] Re: Election issue: forwarding problem, Julian Mehnle, 19:05
- [spf-discuss] Re: Election issue: forwarding problem, Julian Mehnle, 19:01
- [spf-discuss] Re: forwarded mail being bounced (by spf check), Julian Mehnle, 18:43
- RE: [spf-discuss] Re: forwarded mail being bounced (by spf check), Seth Goodman, 14:52
- Re: [spf-discuss] Election issue: forwarding problem, David MacQuigg, 13:49
- [spf-discuss] Re: forwarded mail being bounced (by spf check), Frank Ellermann, 12:53
- [spf-discuss] SPF 2007 Council Elections - Voting Reminder, william(at)elan.net, 12:32
- Re: [spf-discuss] Election issue: forwarding problem, Stuart D. Gathman, 12:06
- RE: [spf-discuss] forwarded mail being bounced (by spf check), Seth Goodman, 11:41
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: forwarded mail being bounced (by spf check), Stuart D. Gathman, 11:04
- Re: [spf-discuss] forwarded mail being bounced (by spf check), Dick St.Peters, 10:48
- [spf-discuss] Re: forwarded mail being bounced (by spf check), Frank Ellermann, 10:41
- [spf-discuss] Re: forwarded mail being bounced (by spf check), Julian Mehnle, 06:56
- Re: [spf-discuss] forwarded mail being bounced (by spf check), Scott Kitterman, 05:59
- Re: [spf-discuss] forwarded mail being bounced (by spf check), Scott Kitterman, 05:59
- Re: [spf-discuss] Election issue: forwarding problem, Scott Kitterman, 05:55
- Re: [spf-discuss] Election issue: forwarding problem, Scott Kitterman, 05:52
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: forwarded mail being bounced (by spf check), Per Jessen, 05:43
- [spf-discuss] Re: forwarded mail being bounced (by spf check), Frank Ellermann, 04:53
- Re: [spf-discuss] Election issue: forwarding problem, Michael Deutschmann, 04:04
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: forwarded mail being bounced (by spf check), Per Jessen, 03:16
- Re: [spf-discuss] forwarded mail being bounced (by spf check), Per Jessen, 02:52
- [spf-discuss] Re: forwarded mail being bounced (by spf check), Frank Ellermann, 02:33
- [spf-discuss] Re: Election issue: forwarding problem, Frank Ellermann, 02:07
- Re: [spf-discuss] forwarded mail being bounced (by spf check), Graham Murray, 01:55
- [spf-discuss] Re: Election issue: forwarding problem, Frank Ellermann, 01:27
- [spf-discuss] forwarded mail being bounced (by spf check), Per Jessen, 01:21
- Re: [spf-discuss] Election issue: forwarding problem, william(at)elan.net, 00:57
- Re: [spf-discuss] Election issue: forwarding problem, william(at)elan.net, 00:05
January 25, 2007
- Re: [spf-discuss] Election issue: forwarding problem, Meng Weng Wong, 23:53
- Re: [spf-discuss] Election issue: forwarding problem, Scott Kitterman, 22:44
- [spf-discuss] Election issue: forwarding problem, Michael Deutschmann, 21:52
- RE: [spf-discuss] Current spf record for comcast.net?, David MacQuigg, 17:26
- [spf-discuss] Re: Current spf record for comcast.net?, Julian Mehnle, 15:12
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Current spf record for comcast.net?, Stuart D. Gathman, 11:30
- [spf-discuss] Re: Current spf record for comcast.net?, Julian Mehnle, 11:10
- [spf-discuss] Re: Status and support for SRS, Julian Mehnle, 11:06
- RE: [spf-discuss] Current spf record for comcast.net?, Seth Goodman, 11:02
- RE: [spf-discuss] Re: Status and support for SRS, Seth Goodman, 10:45
- RE: [spf-discuss] Current spf record for comcast.net?, David MacQuigg, 10:05
- [spf-discuss] Re: Status and support for SRS, Julian Mehnle, 08:28
- RE: [spf-discuss] Re: Status and support for SRS, Seth Goodman, 08:03
- RE: [spf-discuss] Re: Status and support for SRS, Seth Goodman, 07:47
- RE: [spf-discuss] Current spf record for comcast.net?, Seth Goodman, 07:33
- Re: [spf-discuss] Current spf record for comcast.net?, David MacQuigg, 06:09
- [spf-discuss] Re: Status and support for SRS, Julian Mehnle, 04:09
- [spf-discuss] Re: Status and support for SRS, Julian Mehnle, 04:04
- [spf-discuss] Re: Status and support for SRS, Julian Mehnle, 03:51
January 24, 2007
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: BLOCK: junkemailfilter.* (fwd), Stuart D. Gathman, 23:29
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: BLOCK: junkemailfilter.* (fwd), Scott Kitterman, 22:46
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: BLOCK: junkemailfilter.* (fwd), Stuart D. Gathman, 22:27
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: BLOCK: junkemailfilter.* (fwd), william(at)elan.net, 20:54
- Re: [spf-discuss] Current spf record for comcast.net?, Scott Kitterman, 20:48
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: BLOCK: junkemailfilter.* (fwd), Scott Kitterman, 20:46
- Re: [spf-discuss] Status and support for SRS, Stuart D. Gathman, 20:27
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: BLOCK: junkemailfilter.* (fwd), Stuart D. Gathman, 20:25
- Re: [spf-discuss] Current spf record for comcast.net?, william(at)elan.net, 20:23
- Re: [spf-discuss] Current spf record for comcast.net?, David MacQuigg, 19:28
- RE: [spf-discuss] Current spf record for comcast.net?, Guy Watkins, 19:26
- RE: [spf-discuss] Current spf record for comcast.net?, Guy Watkins, 19:24
- [spf-discuss] Status and support for SRS, william(at)elan.net, 19:18
- [spf-discuss] Re: BLOCK: junkemailfilter.* (fwd), william(at)elan.net, 19:16
- Re: [spf-discuss] Current spf record for comcast.net?, Scott Kitterman, 18:20
- Re: [spf-discuss] Current spf record for comcast.net?, David MacQuigg, 15:49
- RE: [spf-discuss] Current spf record for comcast.net?, Seth Goodman, 10:55
- Re: [spf-discuss] Current spf record for comcast.net?, Scott Kitterman, 10:03
- RE: [spf-discuss] Current spf record for comcast.net?, Seth Goodman, 08:50
- Re: [spf-discuss] Current spf record for comcast.net?, Rene Barbier, 01:04
January 22, 2007
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: 2007 SPF Council Election now under way, Meng Weng Wong, 22:30
- [spf-discuss] Re: 2007 SPF Council Election now under way, william(at)elan.net, 21:50
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: 2007 SPF Council Election now under way, Dotzero, 20:10
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: SPFv1 / RFC 4408 compliance logo, Scott Kitterman, 17:10
- [spf-discuss] Re: CIVS pretending MAIL FROM (envelope sender) addresses / SPF problem, Julian Mehnle, 16:18
- [spf-discuss] Re: 2007 SPF Council Election now under way, william(at)elan.net, 16:16
- [spf-discuss] 2007 SPF Council Election now under way, william(at)elan.net, 16:10
- RE: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF Setup, Jim Beauchamp, 11:55
- [spf-discuss] Re: SPF Setup, Julian Mehnle, 11:45
- RE: [spf-discuss] SPF Setup, Jim Beauchamp, 11:38
- [spf-discuss] Re: SPFv1 / RFC 4408 compliance logo, Frank Ellermann, 09:10
- [spf-discuss] Re: SPFv1 / RFC 4408 compliance logo, Julian Mehnle, 09:00
- [spf-discuss] Re: SPFv1 / RFC 4408 compliance logo, Frank Ellermann, 08:54
- [spf-discuss] Re: SPFv1 / RFC 4408 compliance logo, Frank Ellermann, 08:46
- [spf-discuss] Re: SPFv1 / RFC 4408 compliance logo, Julian Mehnle, 05:02
- [spf-discuss] Re: SPFv1 / RFC 4408 compliance logo, Julian Mehnle, 04:52
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: SPFv1 / RFC 4408 compliance logo, william(at)elan.net, 01:05
January 21, 2007
- [spf-discuss] If I am elected I will..., Scott Kitterman, 22:10
- [spf-discuss] Re: SPFv1 / RFC 4408 compliance logo, Frank Ellermann, 22:08
- [spf-discuss] Re: SPFv1 / RFC 4408 compliance logo, Frank Ellermann, 22:01
- [spf-discuss] Re: SPFv1 / RFC 4408 compliance logo, Frank Ellermann, 21:53
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: SPFv1 / RFC 4408 compliance logo, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 20:27
- [spf-discuss] Re: SPFv1 / RFC 4408 compliance logo, Julian Mehnle, 19:46
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: SPFv1 / RFC 4408 compliance logo, Stuart D. Gathman, 19:42
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: SPFv1 / RFC 4408 compliance logo, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 19:35
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: SPFv1 / RFC 4408 compliance logo, Stuart D. Gathman, 19:18
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: SPFv1 / RFC 4408 compliance logo, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 18:43
- [spf-discuss] Re: SPFv1 / RFC 4408 compliance logo, Don Lee, 18:40
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: SPFv1 / RFC 4408 compliance logo, Stuart D. Gathman, 17:49
- [spf-discuss] Re: SPFv1 / RFC 4408 compliance logo, Julian Mehnle, 16:10
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: SPFv1 / RFC 4408 compliance logo, Terry Fielder, 16:09
- [spf-discuss] Re: SPFv1 / RFC 4408 compliance logo, Julian Mehnle, 16:07
- [spf-discuss] Re: SPFv1 / RFC 4408 compliance logo, Frank Ellermann, 15:50
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: SPFv1 / RFC 4408 compliance logo, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 15:31
- [spf-discuss] Re: SPFv1 / RFC 4408 compliance logo, Julian Mehnle, 15:06
- RE: [spf-discuss] SPFv1 / RFC 4408 compliance logo, Guy, 14:37
- [spf-discuss] Re: SPFv1 / RFC 4408 compliance logo, Julian Mehnle, 14:21
- [spf-discuss] Re: SPFv1 / RFC 4408 compliance logo, Frank Ellermann, 13:54
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPFv1 / RFC 4408 compliance logo, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 13:40
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPFv1 / RFC 4408 compliance logo, Terry Fielder, 12:56
- [spf-discuss] SPFv1 / RFC 4408 compliance logo, Julian Mehnle, 12:36
- [spf-discuss] Re: Nominations for Elections., Julian Mehnle, 05:52
- [spf-discuss] Re: Nominations for Elections., Frank Ellermann, 04:05
- [spf-discuss] SPF Council Election - Last call for nominated candidates to confirm or decline, william(at)elan.net, 00:17
January 18, 2007
- [spf-discuss] Re: Erratum <explanation>, Frank Ellermann, 22:33
- [spf-discuss] Re: SPF Council Election - Request for nominated candidates to confirm availability to serve on 2007 SPF Council (fwd), Stuart D. Gathman, 12:28
- [spf-discuss] Re: Bug in #exp-syntax-error, #redirect-empty-domain,#redirect-syntax-error tests or the spec], Julian Mehnle, 05:03
- [spf-discuss] New Python SPF Policy Daemon for Postfix, Scott Kitterman, 00:41
January 17, 2007
- [spf-discuss] Re: [spf-devel] Re: Calling BNF lawyers, Stuart D. Gathman, 20:11
- [spf-discuss] Re: Calling BNF lawyers, Julian Mehnle, 20:05
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Calling BNF lawyers, Stuart D. Gathman, 18:40
- [spf-discuss] Re: Calling BNF lawyers, Julian Mehnle, 18:20
- [spf-discuss] Re: [spf-devel] Re: Calling BNF lawyers, Stuart D. Gathman, 18:14
- [spf-discuss] Re: Calling BNF lawyers, Julian Mehnle, 18:07
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Erratum <explanation>, Stuart D. Gathman, 17:57
- [spf-discuss] Re: Erratum <explanation>, Julian Mehnle, 17:46
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Erratum <explanation>, Scott Kitterman, 07:45
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Erratum <explanation>, Stuart D. Gathman, 07:33
January 16, 2007
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF Council Election - Request for nominated candidates to confirm availability to serve on 2007 SPF Council, Scott Kitterman, 22:36
- [spf-discuss] SPF Council Election - Request for nominated candidates to confirm availability to serve on 2007 SPF Council, william(at)elan.net, 20:55
- Re: [spf-discuss] Include tag for hosted services, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 16:07
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Erratum <explanation>, Stuart D. Gathman, 16:00
- Re: [spf-discuss] Include tag for hosted services, Stuart D. Gathman, 15:58
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Erratum <explanation>, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 14:47
- [spf-discuss] Re: Erratum <explanation>, Julian Mehnle, 13:32
- [spf-discuss] Include tag for hosted services, Rasmus Mencke, 12:49
- [spf-discuss] Re: Erratum <explanation>, Frank Ellermann, 12:37
- RE: [spf-discuss] The forwarder's perspective, Seth Goodman, 12:12
- [spf-discuss] Re: Erratum <explanation>, Julian Mehnle, 10:54
- [spf-discuss] Re: Erratum <explanation>, Frank Ellermann, 10:43
- [spf-discuss] Re: spfd performance, Julian Mehnle, 10:41
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Erratum <explanation>, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 10:39
- [spf-discuss] Re: Erratum <explanation>, Julian Mehnle, 10:29
- [spf-discuss] spfd performance, Dan_Mitton, 09:50
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Erratum <explanation>, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 09:37
- [spf-discuss] Re: Erratum <explanation>, Julian Mehnle, 09:10
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Erratum <explanation>, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 08:37
- [spf-discuss] Re: Erratum <explanation>, Julian Mehnle, 08:25
- [spf-discuss] Erratum <explanation> (was: Quick poll: Is "v=spf1 exp= -all" a syntax error?), Frank Ellermann, 08:11
January 15, 2007
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Better approach to the forwarder problem, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 22:30
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Better approach to the forwarder problem, Michael Deutschmann, 21:54
- Re: [spf-discuss] The forwarder's perspective, Dick St.Peters, 20:51
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Better approach to the forwarder problem, Dick St.Peters, 20:16
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: The forwarder's perspective, Michael Deutschmann, 17:46
- [spf-discuss] Re: RFC 4408 errata: empty domain-spec on exp modifier, Julian Mehnle, 17:42
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Better approach to the forwarder problem, Jeremy Harris, 17:41
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: RFC 4408 errata: empty domain-spec on exp modifier, Stuart D. Gathman, 17:06
- Re: [spf-discuss] The forwarder's perspective, Leonard Mills, 16:54
- Re: [spf-discuss] The forwarder's perspective, Michael Deutschmann, 16:37
- [spf-discuss] Re: RFC 4408 errata: empty domain-spec on exp modifier, Julian Mehnle, 16:33
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Better approach to the forwarder problem, Michael Deutschmann, 16:20
- [spf-discuss] Re: Quick poll: Is "v=spf1 exp= -all" a syntax error?, Frank Ellermann, 16:10
- Re: [spf-discuss] Quick poll: Is "v=spf1 exp= -all" a syntax error?, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 16:09
- [spf-discuss] RFC 4408 errata: empty domain-spec on exp modifier, Stuart D. Gathman, 16:08
- [spf-discuss] Quick poll: Is "v=spf1 exp= -all" a syntax error?, Julian Mehnle, 15:58
- [spf-discuss] Re: Implicit MX, Frank Ellermann, 15:47
- [spf-discuss] Re: op= question, Frank Ellermann, 15:43
- [spf-discuss] Re: op= question, Frank Ellermann, 15:15
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Implicit MX, Scott Kitterman, 15:08
- [spf-discuss] Re: Implicit MX, Frank Ellermann, 14:58
- [spf-discuss] Re: Better approach to the forwarder problem, Frank Ellermann, 14:34
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Better approach to the forwarder problem, Jeremy Harris, 13:43
- RE: [spf-discuss] Implicit MX (was: Another test case for the test suite...), Don Lee, 09:42
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Better approach to the forwarder problem, Lou Katz, 02:14
- RE: [spf-discuss] Implicit MX (was: Another test case for the test suite...), Seth Goodman, 00:18
- RE: [spf-discuss] Implicit A, Seth Goodman, 00:04
January 14, 2007
- Re: [spf-discuss] Implicit MX (was: Another test case for the test suite...), Alex van den Bogaerdt, 23:45
- Re: [spf-discuss] Implicit A, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 23:41
- RE: [spf-discuss] Implicit MX (was: Another test case for the test suite...), Seth Goodman, 23:35
- RE: [spf-discuss] Implicit A (was: Implicit MX), Seth Goodman, 22:49
- HELO Scope: was - Re: [spf-discuss] Implicit A (was: Implicit MX), Scott Kitterman, 21:42
- Re: [spf-discuss] Implicit A (was: Implicit MX), Stuart D. Gathman, 21:38
- Re: [spf-discuss] Implicit A (was: Implicit MX), Alex van den Bogaerdt, 21:17
- RE: [spf-discuss] proposed spf3 non-contiguous address notation, Seth Goodman, 20:59
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Better approach to the forwarder problem, Dick St.Peters, 20:39
- RE: [spf-discuss] Implicit MX (was: Another test case for the test suite...), Seth Goodman, 20:28
- Re: [spf-discuss] proposed spf3 non-contiguous address notation, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 20:15
- RE: [spf-discuss] proposed spf3 non-contiguous address notation, Seth Goodman, 20:01
- Re: [spf-discuss] proposed spf3 non-contiguous address notation, william(at)elan.net, 19:22
- Re: [spf-discuss] The forwarder's perspective, Dick St.Peters, 19:10
- [spf-discuss] Re: The 2007 Council Elections: Register NOW!, Julian Mehnle, 17:37
- Re: [spf-discuss] proposed spf3 non-contiguous address notation, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 17:37
- Re: [spf-discuss] Implicit MX (was: Another test case for the test suite...), Alex van den Bogaerdt, 17:31
- [spf-discuss] Re: The forwarder's perspective, Julian Mehnle, 17:25
- RE: [spf-discuss] Implicit MX (was: Another test case for the test suite...), Seth Goodman, 17:20
- RE: [spf-discuss] proposed spf3 non-contiguous address notation, Seth Goodman, 17:15
- [spf-discuss] Re: op= question, Julian Mehnle, 17:13
- [spf-discuss] The _real_ motivation for SPFv3 (plus: v=spf666), Julian Mehnle, 17:06
- RE: [spf-discuss] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., Seth Goodman, 16:52
- [spf-discuss] Re: op= question, Frank Ellermann, 16:46
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., wayne, 15:53
- Re: [spf-discuss] Don't: "v=spf1 <spf3 syntax>"!, wayne, 13:13
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: op= question, wayne, 13:10
- Re: [spf-discuss] Implicit MX (was: Another test case for the test suite...), Alex van den Bogaerdt, 12:48
- RE: [spf-discuss] Implicit MX (was: Another test case for the test suite...), Seth Goodman, 12:22
- Re: [spf-discuss] proposed spf3 non-contiguous address notation, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 12:02
- Re: [spf-discuss] Implicit MX (was: Another test case for the test suite...), Alex van den Bogaerdt, 11:57
- [spf-discuss] proposed spf3 non-contiguous address notation, Seth Goodman, 11:44
- RE: [spf-discuss] Implicit MX (was: Another test case for the test suite...), Seth Goodman, 10:39
- [spf-discuss] The appointed 2007 council election officer, Julian Mehnle, 05:17
- [spf-discuss] Re: op= question, Julian Mehnle, 05:12
- [spf-discuss] Re: op= question, Frank Ellermann, 03:33
- [spf-discuss] Don't: "v=spf1 <spf3 syntax>"! (was: Another test case for the test suite...), Julian Mehnle, 03:07
January 13, 2007
- [spf-discuss] op= question, Stuart D. Gathman, 22:19
- [spf-discuss] Implicit MX (was: Another test case for the test suite...), Frank Ellermann, 21:45
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., Alex van den Bogaerdt, 20:45
- RE: [spf-discuss] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., Seth Goodman, 20:25
- [spf-discuss] The forwarder's perspective, Michael Deutschmann, 19:27
- [spf-discuss] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., Julian Mehnle, 18:55
- [spf-discuss] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., Frank Ellermann, 18:30
- [spf-discuss] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., Frank Ellermann, 17:33
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., Stuart D. Gathman, 16:58
- [spf-discuss] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., Julian Mehnle, 16:40
- [spf-discuss] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., Julian Mehnle, 16:40
- [spf-discuss] Re: spfd options / features, Julian Mehnle, 15:55
- [spf-discuss] Re: Better approach to the forwarder problem, Frank Ellermann, 15:29
- [spf-discuss] spfd options / features, Dan_Mitton, 15:02
- [spf-discuss] Re: Better approach to the forwarder problem, Frank Ellermann, 14:52
- [spf-discuss] Re: Better approach to the forwarder problem, Frank Ellermann, 14:32
- [spf-discuss] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., Frank Ellermann, 14:15
- [spf-discuss] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., Frank Ellermann, 12:57
- [spf-discuss] Re: SPF in the news, Frank Ellermann, 12:09
- Re: [spf-discuss] "Packaging" SPF, Scott Kitterman, 12:02
- [spf-discuss] Re: SPF in the news, Frank Ellermann, 10:58
- [spf-discuss] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., Julian Mehnle, 01:31
January 12, 2007
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., wayne, 22:06
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF in the news, wayne, 21:54
- Re: [spf-discuss] "Packaging" SPF, Graham Beneke, 21:44
- [spf-discuss] SPF in the news, wayne, 21:43
- RE: [spf-discuss] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., Seth Goodman, 16:39
- [spf-discuss] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., Julian Mehnle, 15:44
- RE: [spf-discuss] Re: Better approach to the forwarder problem, Seth Goodman, 15:37
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: The SPF RR type, how?, Scott Kitterman, 15:30
- RE: [spf-discuss] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., Seth Goodman, 15:14
- [spf-discuss] The 2007 Council Elections: Register NOW!, Julian Mehnle, 15:10
- RE: [spf-discuss] Re: Better approach to the forwarder problem, Seth Goodman, 14:54
- [spf-discuss] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., Julian Mehnle, 14:54
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., Stuart D. Gathman, 14:50
- [spf-discuss] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., Julian Mehnle, 14:31
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Better approach to the forwarder problem, Stuart D. Gathman, 14:23
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., wayne, 14:11
- [spf-discuss] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., Julian Mehnle, 14:06
- [spf-discuss] Re: The SPF RR type, how?, Julian Mehnle, 14:01
- [spf-discuss] Re: Better approach to the forwarder problem, Don Lee, 14:00
- [spf-discuss] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., Julian Mehnle, 13:51
- [spf-discuss] Fail to safety (was: Another test case for the test suite...), Julian Mehnle, 13:45
- [spf-discuss] Re: Better approach to the forwarder problem, Julian Mehnle, 13:33
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Better approach to the forwarder problem, Stuart D. Gathman, 13:28
- [spf-discuss] Re: Better approach to the forwarder problem, Don Lee, 13:27
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Better approach to the forwarder problem, Don Lee, 13:25
- RE: [spf-discuss] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., Don Lee, 13:25
- [spf-discuss] Re: Better approach to the forwarder problem, Julian Mehnle, 13:15
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Better approach to the forwarder problem, Stuart D. Gathman, 13:12
- RE: [spf-discuss] Re: Better approach to the forwarder problem, Seth Goodman, 12:25
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Better approach to the forwarder problem, Dick St.Peters, 11:36
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Better approach to the forwarder problem, Dick St.Peters, 11:21
- RE: [spf-discuss] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., Seth Goodman, 11:11
- [spf-discuss] Re: Better approach to the forwarder problem, Don Lee, 09:58
- Re: [spf-discuss] The SPF RR type, how?, Stuart D. Gathman, 09:56
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., Stuart D. Gathman, 09:46
- [spf-discuss] Re: Better approach to the forwarder problem, Frank Ellermann, 09:43
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., Stuart D. Gathman, 09:31
- [spf-discuss] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., Frank Ellermann, 09:24
- [spf-discuss] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., Frank Ellermann, 09:03
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Better approach to the forwarder problem, Dick St.Peters, 09:01
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., wayne, 08:55
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., Alex van den Bogaerdt, 08:26
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., wayne, 08:05
- [spf-discuss] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., Frank Ellermann, 07:58
- RE: [spf-discuss] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., Devin Ganger, 07:56
- RE: [spf-discuss] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., Devin Ganger, 07:53
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., wayne, 07:35
- [spf-discuss] Re: Better approach to the forwarder problem, Frank Ellermann, 07:22
- [spf-discuss] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., Frank Ellermann, 07:20
- Re: [spf-discuss] The SPF RR type, how?, Scott Kitterman, 06:59
- [spf-discuss] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., Frank Ellermann, 06:22
- [spf-discuss] Re: Better approach to the forwarder problem, Julian Mehnle, 04:40
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., Alex van den Bogaerdt, 04:10
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Better approach to the forwarder problem, paddy, 03:35
- RE: [spf-discuss] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., Devin Ganger, 03:30
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Better approach to the forwarder problem, Michael Deutschmann, 00:19
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., Don Lee, 00:17
January 11, 2007
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., wayne, 22:12
- [spf-discuss] The SPF RR type, how?, Guy, 22:08
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., wayne, 22:06
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., Alex van den Bogaerdt, 22:04
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., Scott Kitterman, 21:59
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., william(at)elan.net, 21:40
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., Alex van den Bogaerdt, 21:34
- RE: [spf-discuss] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., Seth Goodman, 21:26
- RE: [spf-discuss] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., Don Lee, 20:53
- [spf-discuss] Re: Better approach to the forwarder problem, Frank Ellermann, 19:27
- RE: [spf-discuss] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., Seth Goodman, 19:25
- [spf-discuss] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., Frank Ellermann, 19:18
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Better approach to the forwarder problem, Stuart D. Gathman, 18:57
- [spf-discuss] Re: Better approach to the forwarder problem, Frank Ellermann, 18:44
- [spf-discuss] Re: Better approach to the forwarder problem, Frank Ellermann, 18:35
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Better approach to the forwarder problem, Michael Deutschmann, 17:30
- [spf-discuss] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., Julian Mehnle, 17:16
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Better approach to the forwarder problem, Stuart D. Gathman, 15:53
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Better approach to the forwarder problem, Dick St.Peters, 15:01
- [spf-discuss] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., Frank Ellermann, 14:13
- [spf-discuss] Re: Better approach to the forwarder problem, Julian Mehnle, 13:46
- RE: [spf-discuss] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., Seth Goodman, 12:09
- RE: [spf-discuss] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., Seth Goodman, 11:23
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Better approach to the forwarder problem, Stuart D. Gathman, 11:16
- RE: [spf-discuss] Re: Better approach to the forwarder problem, Seth Goodman, 11:03
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Better approach to the forwarder problem, Stuart D. Gathman, 10:55
- [spf-discuss] Re: Better approach to the forwarder problem, Julian Mehnle, 04:09
- [spf-discuss] Re: Better approach to the forwarder problem, Julian Mehnle, 04:03
January 10, 2007
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Better approach to the forwarder problem, Michael Deutschmann, 20:24
- Re: [spf-discuss] The 2007 Council Elections: Register NOW! (plus: Call for nominations for the election officer), Scott Kitterman, 18:58
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., Alex van den Bogaerdt, 18:07
- [spf-discuss] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., Frank Ellermann, 17:36
- [spf-discuss] Re: [spf-devel] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., Stuart D. Gathman, 17:07
- Re: [spf-discuss] Better approach to the forwarder problem, Stuart D. Gathman, 17:06
- [spf-discuss] Re: Better approach to the forwarder problem, Don Lee, 17:05
- Re: [spf-discuss] Better approach to the forwarder problem, Don Lee, 16:45
- [spf-discuss] Re: [spf-devel] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., Frank Ellermann, 16:18
- [spf-discuss] Re: Better approach to the forwarder problem, Frank Ellermann, 16:10
- [spf-discuss] Better approach to the forwarder problem, Michael Deutschmann, 15:37
- [spf-discuss] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., Don Lee, 13:50
- [spf-discuss] Re: [spf-devel] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., Stuart D. Gathman, 13:50
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., Stuart D. Gathman, 13:43
- [spf-discuss] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., Frank Ellermann, 12:46
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: "Packaging" SPF, Scott Kitterman, 11:42
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., william(at)elan.net, 11:27
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., william(at)elan.net, 11:12
- [spf-discuss] Re: "Packaging" SPF, Julian Mehnle, 11:11
- Re: [spf-discuss] "Packaging" SPF, Scott Kitterman, 11:04
- Re: [spf-discuss] "Packaging" SPF, Graham Beneke, 10:57
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., wayne, 10:51
- [spf-discuss] "Packaging" SPF, Scott Kitterman, 10:37
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., Stuart D. Gathman, 10:35
- [spf-discuss] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., Julian Mehnle, 10:34
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., Stuart D. Gathman, 10:34
- [spf-discuss] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., Julian Mehnle, 10:21
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., william(at)elan.net, 10:19
- Re: [spf-discuss] Mail::SPF 2.003 with Perl 5.6 compatibility (was: libspf2 sample programs), Dan_Mitton, 09:55
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., Alex van den Bogaerdt, 09:44
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., wayne, 09:38
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., Scott Kitterman, 09:32
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., Alex van den Bogaerdt, 09:24
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., wayne, 09:22
- [spf-discuss] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., Julian Mehnle, 09:06
- [spf-discuss] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., Julian Mehnle, 09:04
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., wayne, 09:03
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., wayne, 09:01
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., Alex van den Bogaerdt, 08:56
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., Stuart D. Gathman, 08:54
- [spf-discuss] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., Julian Mehnle, 08:52
- [spf-discuss] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., Frank Ellermann, 08:47
- [spf-discuss] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., Julian Mehnle, 08:44
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: [spf-devel] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., Alex van den Bogaerdt, 08:40
- [spf-discuss] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., Frank Ellermann, 08:40
- [spf-discuss] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., Julian Mehnle, 08:35
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., wayne, 08:29
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: [spf-devel] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., Scott Kitterman, 08:28
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: [spf-devel] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., Stuart D. Gathman, 08:27
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: [spf-devel] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., Alex van den Bogaerdt, 08:21
- [spf-discuss] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., Frank Ellermann, 08:13
- [spf-discuss] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., Julian Mehnle, 08:01
- [spf-discuss] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., Julian Mehnle, 07:55
January 09, 2007
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., wayne, 22:55
- RE: [spf-discuss] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., Guy, 22:51
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: [spf-devel] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., wayne, 22:48
- RE: [spf-discuss] Re: [spf-devel] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., Guy, 22:44
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., wayne, 22:38
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: [spf-devel] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., Scott Kitterman, 22:37
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., wayne, 22:31
- RE: [spf-discuss] Re: [spf-devel] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., Guy Watkins, 22:30
- RE: [spf-discuss] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., Guy, 22:25
- [spf-discuss] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., Frank Ellermann, 22:19
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: [spf-devel] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., Alex van den Bogaerdt, 21:51
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: [spf-devel] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., Scott Kitterman, 21:26
- [spf-discuss] Re: [spf-devel] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., Don Lee, 21:04
- [spf-discuss] Re: [spf-devel] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., Stuart D. Gathman, 19:57
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., Scott Kitterman, 19:36
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., Alex van den Bogaerdt, 18:40
- [spf-discuss] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., Julian Mehnle, 18:26
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., Alex van den Bogaerdt, 18:12
- [spf-discuss] Re: Another test case for the test suite..., Julian Mehnle, 17:45
- [spf-discuss] Mail::SPF 2.003 with Perl 5.6 compatibility (was: libspf2 sample programs), Julian Mehnle, 17:39
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: libspf2 sample programs, Scott Kitterman, 12:05
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: libspf2 sample programs, Dan_Mitton, 11:50
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: libspf2 sample programs, Scott Kitterman, 11:40
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: libspf2 sample programs, Dan_Mitton, 11:23
January 08, 2007
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: libspf 1 seems dead in the water, Scott Kitterman, 18:28
- [spf-discuss] Re: libspf 1 seems dead in the water, Julian Mehnle, 17:20
- [spf-discuss] libspf 1 seems dead in the water, Michael Deutschmann, 16:07
- [spf-discuss] Re: Nominations for Elections., Frank Ellermann, 11:38
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: libspf2 sample programs, Stuart D. Gathman, 07:37
- [spf-discuss] Re: Nominations for Elections., Julian Mehnle, 07:01
- [spf-discuss] Re: The 2007 Council Elections: Register NOW! (plus: Call for nominations for the election officer), Julian Mehnle, 07:00
- Re: [spf-discuss] The 2007 Council Elections: Register NOW! (plus: Call for nominations for the election officer), Scott Kitterman, 06:26
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: libspf2 sample programs, Jason LEWIS, 02:23
January 06, 2007
- RE: [spf-discuss] Problem with check-auth(_at_)verifier(_dot_)port25(_dot_)com, Guy, 21:41
- Re: [spf-discuss] Problem with check-auth(_at_)verifier(_dot_)port25(_dot_)com, Stuart D. Gathman, 21:35
- Re: [spf-discuss] Problem with check-auth(_at_)verifier(_dot_)port25(_dot_)com, Stuart D. Gathman, 21:30
- [spf-discuss] Problem with check-auth(_at_)verifier(_dot_)port25(_dot_)com, Guy, 21:08
- [spf-discuss] Recent Statistics From spf-test(_at_)openspf(_dot_)org, Scott Kitterman, 15:39
January 05, 2007
- Re: 2007 Election Process was - Re: [spf-discuss] Will not be able to be on spf council next year, william(at)elan.net, 17:41
- [spf-discuss] Re: 2007 Election Process, Julian Mehnle, 11:39
- Re: [spf-discuss] Nominations for Elections., Scott Kitterman, 11:06
- 2007 Election Process was - Re: [spf-discuss] Will not be able to be on spf council next year, Scott Kitterman, 11:02
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: libspf2 sample programs, Stuart D. Gathman, 09:58
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: libspf2 sample programs, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 09:23
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: libspf2 sample programs, Stuart D. Gathman, 09:01
- RE: [spf-discuss] Newcomer question - email admin perspective, Stuart D. Gathman, 08:41
- Re: followup: Re: [spf-discuss] libspf2 sample programs, Peter Bowyer, 03:01
- RE: [spf-discuss] Newcomer question - email admin perspective, Seth Goodman, 02:50
January 04, 2007
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: libspf2 sample programs, Scott Kitterman, 21:52
- [spf-discuss] Will not be able to be on spf council next year, william(at)elan.net, 21:44
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: libspf2 sample programs, Don Lee, 20:20
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: libspf2 sample programs, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 20:06
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: libspf2 sample programs, Stuart D. Gathman, 19:59
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: libspf2 sample programs, william(at)elan.net, 19:58
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: libspf2 sample programs, Dan_Mitton, 19:46
- [spf-discuss] Re: libspf2 sample programs, Don Lee, 19:46
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: libspf2 sample programs, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 19:46
- [spf-discuss] Re: libspf2 sample programs, Julian Mehnle, 17:59
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: libspf2 sample programs, Dan_Mitton, 17:44
- [spf-discuss] Re: libspf2 sample programs, Julian Mehnle, 17:29
- Re: followup: Re: [spf-discuss] libspf2 sample programs, Stuart D. Gathman, 16:39
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: libspf2 sample programs, Dan_Mitton, 16:28
- RE: [spf-discuss] Newcomer question - email admin perspective, Stuart D. Gathman, 16:27
- RE: [spf-discuss] Newcomer question - email admin perspective, Seth Goodman, 15:32
- Re: followup: Re: [spf-discuss] libspf2 sample programs, Scott Kitterman, 15:30
- Re: followup: Re: [spf-discuss] libspf2 sample programs, Dan_Mitton, 15:19
- RE: [spf-discuss] Newcomer question - email admin perspective, Seth Goodman, 15:17
- Re: followup: Re: [spf-discuss] libspf2 sample programs, Dan_Mitton, 15:10
- Re: followup: Re: [spf-discuss] libspf2 sample programs, Don Lee, 14:32
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: libspf2 sample programs, Dan_Mitton, 14:27
- [spf-discuss] Re: libspf2 sample programs, Julian Mehnle, 14:19
- [spf-discuss] Re: libspf2 sample programs, Julian Mehnle, 14:13
- Re: followup: Re: [spf-discuss] libspf2 sample programs, Don Lee, 14:12
- Re: followup: Re: [spf-discuss] libspf2 sample programs, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 14:07
- Re: followup: Re: [spf-discuss] libspf2 sample programs, Dan_Mitton, 14:02
- Re: followup: Re: [spf-discuss] libspf2 sample programs, Stuart D. Gathman, 13:14
- Re: followup: Re: [spf-discuss] libspf2 sample programs, Scott Kitterman, 12:22
- Re: followup: Re: [spf-discuss] libspf2 sample programs, Don Lee, 12:18
- Re: followup: Re: [spf-discuss] libspf2 sample programs, Scott Kitterman, 11:59
- followup: Re: [spf-discuss] libspf2 sample programs, Don Lee, 11:37
- Re: [spf-discuss] libspf2 sample programs, Scott Kitterman, 10:36
- Re: [spf-discuss] libspf2 sample programs, Ramprasad, 08:56
January 02, 2007
- RE: [spf-discuss] Newcomer question - email admin perspective, Don Lee, 15:53
- RE: [spf-discuss] Newcomer question - email admin perspective, Stuart D. Gathman, 15:36
- RE: [spf-discuss] Newcomer question - email admin perspective, Dick St.Peters, 15:35
- RE: [spf-discuss] Newcomer question - email admin perspective, Seth Goodman, 15:33
- RE: [spf-discuss] Newcomer question - email admin perspective, Seth Goodman, 15:02
- Re: [spf-discuss] Newcomer question - email admin perspective, Don Lee, 11:53
- Re: [spf-discuss] Newcomer question - email admin perspective, Stuart D. Gathman, 11:28
- Re: [spf-discuss] libspf2 sample programs, Dick St.Peters, 10:45
- [spf-discuss] Newcomer question - email admin perspective, Don Lee, 10:32
- [spf-discuss] libspf2 sample programs, Ramprasad, 08:06