I think you should center the "SPF" and put V1 under "Compliant".
Guy
} -----Original Message-----
} From: Julian Mehnle [mailto:julian(_at_)mehnle(_dot_)net]
} Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2007 2:34 PM
} To: SPF Discussion
} Subject: [spf-discuss] SPFv1 / RFC 4408 compliance logo
}
} -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
} Hash: SHA1
}
} Hi all,
}
} I designed a compliance logo for SPFv1 / RFC 4408 implementations:
}
} http://www.openspf.org/RFC_4408/Compliance_Logo
}
} Please send your comments!
}
} The eventual license is supposed to be a restrictive one, i.e. the council
} would probably have to confirm an implementation's compliance (either by
} itself or through some delegate) and then grant a specific license to the
} maker of the software to use the logo in association with the software.
}
} Or we could try a liberal approach, although I'm not sure whether it could
} work.
}
} -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
} Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
}
} iD8DBQFFs8A0wL7PKlBZWjsRAtVBAJ9GdZz+U0I8+s935tAfXF23D89PdQCg15mD
} fT145ojCJhwU7Yr7wqAW38o=
} =NLsQ
} -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
}
} -------
} Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
} Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
} To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
} subscription,
} please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=735
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=735