On Thu, 18 Jan 2007, Julian Mehnle wrote:
Ignoring the grammar for a moment (as you did), why should "exp=-all" be
ignored, but "exp:exp.%{d}" should not? I mean, it's just a typo after
all, right? Making such a distinction would be kind of arbitrary.
Because "exp=-all" is not a syntax error.
modifier = redirect | explanation | unknown-modifier
It does not match explanation, but it *does* match unknown-modifier.
--
Stuart D. Gathman <stuart(_at_)bmsi(_dot_)com>
Business Management Systems Inc. Phone: 703 591-0911 Fax: 703 591-6154
"Confutatis maledictis, flammis acribus addictis" - background song for
a Microsoft sponsored "Where do you want to go from here?" commercial.
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=735