spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Erratum <explanation>

2007-01-16 08:37:43
On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 03:24:51PM +0000, Julian Mehnle wrote:

Right.  Why should the grammar allow an argument-less and completely 
nonsensical "exp=" when it enforces even the correct numerical range for 
IP address octets?


Is the BNF more important than the rest of the RFC ?  If so, why is
the rest even included ?


We can change appendix A,

   explanation      = "exp" "=" domain-spec
into
   explanation      = "exp" "=" [ domain-spec ]

to match the current protocol as defined, or we can modify large part
of section 6.2, as well as the protocol as defined today.

Frankly, I couldn't care less about which it is going to be.


Alex

-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=735