-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Frank Ellermann wrote:
Alex van den Bogaerdt wrote:
RFC4408 section 6.2 explains what happens in case of an empty
domain-spec ( "exp" "=" domain-spec ).
Madness, <domain-spec> is never empty. That's an erratum, the
prose you've quoted and the syntax have to be updated, something
like this:
~~~ old ~~~
explanation = "exp" "=" domain-spec
~~~ new ~~~
explanation = "exp" "=" [ domain-spec ]
~~~ end ~~~
Ugly like hell. Maybe it's better to fix the prose so that it
matches the existing syntax (?)
Right. Why should the grammar allow an argument-less and completely
nonsensical "exp=" when it enforces even the correct numerical range for
IP address octets?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFFrO5EwL7PKlBZWjsRAsRZAKCiPQJ1fNmxXfAgvFaZuyeCXUhfoACgsG8N
0lbhwN+zY4jjSomBjddlEa8=
=6aGJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=735