spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

[spf-discuss] Re: SPFv1 / RFC 4408 compliance logo

2007-01-22 09:00:52
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Frank Ellermann wrote:
Yes, a combined SPF+PRA implementation is forced to violate either the
RECOMMENDATION in RFC 4408, or the SHOULD in 4406.  If they study the
IESG note and hopefully also the appeal(s) they'll do the right thing,

I vaguely recall that one combo implementation in fact follows RFC 4408,
but I've no good idea how to search for the source (here or in "help").

For the record, Mail::SPF is such a combo implementation that resolves the 
conflict in favor of RFC 4408.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFtN8XwL7PKlBZWjsRAlWvAKD3yyNfKiYO1MNd3Pxpl00w6GjKzACgxB0y
SpPEmK159TbxjXrzhI85Gck=
=RXX+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=735

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>