-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Frank Ellermann wrote:
Julian Mehnle wrote:
I'd consider a S-ID implementation that also passes the RFC 4408
test suite to be incompliant with RFC 4408.
Not necessarily. Only if it gets its PRA result interpreting the v=spf1
record. [...]
Well, yeah, that was kinda implicit, since the "v=spf1"/PRA abuse is what
the S-ID specification says. :-)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFFtKUfwL7PKlBZWjsRAoA4AKCQis6agxat5rlY8Dgtt2FrUoz64ACgkWm5
4Ol57eDuddHiFknoRfpuCIQ=
=xgHE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=735