Stuart D. Gathman wrote:
Here is an idea - maybe we can't practically test ahead of time for
mislabelling non-SPF results as SPF. But we *can* state in the rules
that any product caught doing so will immediately have its certification
withdrawn, and have some onerous process to get recertified.
+1 "Clearly violating a RECOMMENDATION not covered in the test suite"
or a similar proviso.
Frank
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=735