spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

[spf-discuss] Re: [spf-devel] Re: Another test case for the test suite...

2007-01-10 13:50:38
On Wed, 10 Jan 2007, Frank Ellermann wrote:


Or maybe I'm wrong, but we should have these two scenarios in the
test suite if that's possible.

Those scenarios have been in the test suite.  Your table does not
include whether the implementation is TXT only, SPF only, or BOTH.
Because of that, many of your table entries actually have two
valid answers:
                 |              SPF type              |
                 +-----------+-----------+------------+
                 | no v=spf1 | no record |  timeout   |
                 |           |           | or not 0/3 |
----+------------+-----------+-----------+------------+
    | no v=spf1  |   None    |   None    |None/TempErr|
    +------------+-----------+-----------+============*
    | no record  |   None    |   None    !None/TempErr!
    +------------+-----------*===========*============*
TXT |  timeout   |   None/   ! TempError ! TempError  |
    | or not 0/3 | TempError !  /None    !            |
----+------------+-----------*===========*------------+

-- 
              Stuart D. Gathman <stuart(_at_)bmsi(_dot_)com>
    Business Management Systems Inc.  Phone: 703 591-0911 Fax: 703 591-6154
"Confutatis maledictis, flammis acribus addictis" - background song for
a Microsoft sponsored "Where do you want to go from here?" commercial.


-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=735

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>