spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Another test case for the test suite...

2007-01-10 10:51:05
In 
<Pine(_dot_)LNX(_dot_)4(_dot_)44(_dot_)0701101228240(_dot_)20626-100000(_at_)bmsred(_dot_)bmsi(_dot_)com>
 "Stuart D. Gathman" <stuart(_at_)bmsi(_dot_)com> writes:

On Wed, 10 Jan 2007, Julian Mehnle wrote:

"quite a few" -- about how large a percentage of all the SPF-equipped 
domains is that?  I'd be really interested.

I don't have any hard numbers, but my recollection from debugging the
problem with pyspf was around 20%.  A very large fraction, anyway.
It would take some scripting time, but going through mail logs and testing 
type
99 for each SPF domain found would get a hard number.

Thanks!

I appreciate this, and I hope the results are no where near the 20%
you remembered.  Even though I don't see any point in type99 records
for SPF since TXT records work fine, I still see a lot of use for
other newer types of DNS records.


-wayne

-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=735

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>