spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [spf-discuss] Implicit MX (was: Another test case for the test suite...)

2007-01-14 17:20:42
Alex van den Bogaerdt wrote on Sunday, January 14, 2007 1:47 PM -0600:

Erm, no, what I mean with "implicit 'a'" is the following:

"v=spf1 a ?all"

A host with an IP address that resolves to "mailhost.example.com" is
implicitly allowed to say "HELO mailhost.example.com".  A host with
a different IP address is NOT forbidden to use the name by default
(in other words: ?all, not -all).

If I understand you correctly, you are suggesting that implicit "a"
means to imply "+a" for every SPF record.  If so, it would then be
hard to say that a domain sends no mail since the implied "+a" in

   "v=spfX -all"

turns it into

   "v=spf1 +a -all"

In that case, you'd need to say

   "v=spfX -a -all"

Just like with the implicit MX, there is often no host that has the
identical name as the domain _and_ is authorized to send mail.

--
Seth Goodman

-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=735

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>