On Sat, 13 Jan 2007, Julian Mehnle wrote:
I've always thought that best-guess was a horrendous idea. It pretends
authorization where there is none. And if you dare to apply reputation to
such a fake "Pass", it becomes a true collateral damage nightmare.
They should have published SPF ... This is one of several scenarios in
my milter for which a published neutral result is subtly better than a none
result. I am careful to make sure neutral is never worse than none,
but I have no compunction about the other direction.
--
Stuart D. Gathman <stuart(_at_)bmsi(_dot_)com>
Business Management Systems Inc. Phone: 703 591-0911 Fax: 703 591-6154
"Confutatis maledictis, flammis acribus addictis" - background song for
a Microsoft sponsored "Where do you want to go from here?" commercial.
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=735