-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Stuart D. Gathman wrote:
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007, David MacQuigg wrote:
Are you seeing substantial difference between say aol.com and
comcast.net? Can you quantify that difference?
Reputation accrue to domain + qualifier. You can't just talk about
aol.com. aol.com:SPF, for instance, has a high reputation.
ID aol.com:SPF reputation: 75.470863,23.933064
75 on a scale of -100..100 for reputation
23 on a scale of 0..100 for confidence
aol.com:neutral, on the other hand, has a very low reputation:
ID aol.com:neutral reputation: -76.159416,99.997415
That is actually the lowest possible score with the current exponential
weighting. There has never been a non-spam from aol.com:neutral.
This is an interesting insight into your personal reputation system. Thank
you!
However, shouldn't a reputation atom be qualified by more than just "SPF"
or "neutral" ("neutral" _what_?)? I'd think you'd at least require
<scope/identity-type>, <method-of-authentication>, <result-of-authenti-
cation>, e.g. "HELO", "SPF", "Pass"?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFFvognwL7PKlBZWjsRAiBPAJ4zG77I1GDbRqnpoYphC9tQYWpwhQCggkWl
5vvFSfofB1j12xBwGaT/3k8=
=xqMb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=735