-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Seth Goodman wrote:
Julian Mehnle wrote on Thursday, January 25, 2007 9:27 AM -0600:
This is not to say that message munging by forwarders is an acceptable
practice. But just like alias-style forwarding, it isn't going to go
away anytime soon and we thus need to deal with it (i.e. try to get it
phased out).
I don't agree that this particular breakage is as common as you suggest.
Do you know of any major providers who munge the message body on alias
forwards?
I don't know any off the top of my head.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFFuPF9wL7PKlBZWjsRAmiAAJ4rB66g59lYy0F3YYgk4bPvpKaUBwCg5RFr
o5kAZKc5O8PT/hnmTPDSE5E=
=VXIG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=735