-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Seth Goodman wrote:
David MacQuigg wrote on Thursday, January 25, 2007 11:02 AM -0600:
Both these problems can be solved if and when spammers start forging
HELO names. Our message to senders will be simple, but powerful.
Sorry! We cannot guarantee delivery of this message. <your domain>
does not have sufficient reputation for <recipient>.
There are two problems with this scenario. Spammers won't forge
HELO names if it doesn't improve deliverability and big ISP's don't
care what small providers say.
However, the customers of big ISPs will care what the customers of small
ISPs say. At least if the latter have the guts to reject the big ISPs'
bad practices. And they have to, or otherwise we're never going to solve
the e-mail abuse problem.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFFuPIxwL7PKlBZWjsRAkciAKDYhJG+SBq6g/qyCJooyXDS9e5C/wCgiUvm
9CW9TWujWy2/W2lXkqRWiHs=
=rw8d
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=735