spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [spf-discuss] SPF basics commentary

2007-01-29 08:55:34
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007, Dick St.Peters wrote:

John Q Spammer owns johnsspamdomain.com, so the name-->IP resolution
is under his control.  He connects to my mail server with IP a.b.c.d
and gives HELO name "mail.johnsspamdomain.com".  I check what that
resolves to and find it resolves to a.b.c.d.  Then I check what
a.b.c.d reverse resolves to and get port6.box4.dialup.isp.pl.  Guess
what I use the PTR for.

That is fine, but PTR did *not* help you authenticate connection.
It was a genuine authentic johnsspamdomain.com HELO name - and you
knew that without checking PTR.  Any reputation points can
properly be assigned to johnsspamdomain.com:HELO.  It was not forged.

I am not complaining about using PTR as part of a spam detection
heuristic.  I do it myself.  I am complaining about using PTR to 
*authenticate* the connection.

spam != forgery

-- 
              Stuart D. Gathman <stuart(_at_)bmsi(_dot_)com>
    Business Management Systems Inc.  Phone: 703 591-0911 Fax: 703 591-6154
"Confutatis maledictis, flammis acribus addictis" - background song for
a Microsoft sponsored "Where do you want to go from here?" commercial.

-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=735