-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Wayne Schlitt wrote:
That said, consider which is more important:
1) Convincing people that, along with publishing a TXT SPF RR, they
should also publish an extra type99 SPF RR.
2) Convincing people that, along with publishing a TXT SPF RR for the
MAILFROM domain, they should also publish an extra TXT SPF RR for
the HELO domain.
I personally think the latter is much more useful, and that both are
somewhat confusing concepts that will strike people as not being
really needed. I think that trying to convince people to do both will
likely cause people to do neither.
I can see where you're coming from, but I don't think we can only hope to
get _one_ message out there. We just need to do better (or at all, in the
first place) on our education efforts.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFFp/fqwL7PKlBZWjsRAhEkAJwPZ2O7e9Mz3BN1kUvYCdbOL1SrrgCg35ba
fT2klArD+s+rDbwgM/izgOE=
=tRt/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=735