spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

[spf-discuss] Re: Another test case for the test suite...

2007-01-13 01:31:49
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Wayne Schlitt wrote:
Julian Mehnle writes:
Actually, I think any implementation that supports type99 records in
any way by default is, at best, bad.

You shouldn't make statements in such generality unless you really
mean it.

You are right, I should make statements like that unless I mean it.

Sadly, I do mean it.  Checking type99 records, by default, just
increases processing time, bandwidth usage, DNS cache utilization,
error rates, etc.  Until such time as there is a non-trivial number of
type99 records that are published and type99 records don't cause
timeouts, checking them is, at best, bad.

Your new wording is way more specific than your original one.  Thanks for 
clarifying it.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFqJiGwL7PKlBZWjsRAix+AKDA4cVmFICRYfVw1w9vjIs2RPhn/wCePdSm
FNYxdJYfOz4PjbX4Qj2qJbs=
=hU8T
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=735

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>