On Thu, 18 Jan 2007, Julian Mehnle wrote:
OMG! You must be kidding! If we followed this interpretation, we could
throw away the grammar definitions for all the known modifiers, because
they'd be simply irrelevant.
Are you really saying that "unknown-modifier" should have been defined as:
unknown-modifier = unknown-modifier-name "=" macro-string
unknown-modifier-name = ( "a" / "b" / "c" / "d" ) name-tail /
No. It just needs a note that says
unknown-modifier = name "=" macro-string
; where name is not any known modifier name
You don't have to spell out such things in detail, but you do have
to say something.
--
Stuart D. Gathman <stuart(_at_)bmsi(_dot_)com>
Business Management Systems Inc. Phone: 703 591-0911 Fax: 703 591-6154
"Confutatis maledictis, flammis acribus addictis" - background song for
a Microsoft sponsored "Where do you want to go from here?" commercial.
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=735