spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Better approach to the forwarder problem

2007-01-12 14:23:27
On Fri, 12 Jan 2007, Don Lee wrote:

Counter-question: why is alias-style forwarding, i.e. the ability to set 
MAIL FROM to whatever you like, so important to preserve?  What does it 
give you that you cannot also achieve in a different way?

Ironically, the reason I cling to this is because I want 
control of what e-mail address(es) I expose.  aka. I don't want to
let the spammers get my *real* address, so I use several, for
different purposes.  Note the MAIL FROM on this post..... :-(

The day I can't give out my real address is the day I stop using email.

I grab the bull by the horns and make my real email public, and get 11000+
spams a day as a result.  However, this makes testing new milter code much
easier. :-) All but a few 100 of the 11000 are rejected in SMTP envelope, the
remaining spams end up in a quarantine.  I see one every day or so that
makes it through (usually by quoting a slashdot article in its 
entirety and adding a jpg at the end).  There are commercial services
that do as good a job for the non-technical enduser.  (e.g. spamsoap.com).
So, the time/money required to delete the spam is just a cost of using email.

-- 
              Stuart D. Gathman <stuart(_at_)bmsi(_dot_)com>
    Business Management Systems Inc.  Phone: 703 591-0911 Fax: 703 591-6154
"Confutatis maledictis, flammis acribus addictis" - background song for
a Microsoft sponsored "Where do you want to go from here?" commercial.

-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=735

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>