-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Frank Ellermann wrote:
Julian Mehnle wrote:
each modifier inventing its own rules can't be a good idea.
Why?
The helo + nohelo example: A policy can set one of these flags, and
redirect to another policy without the mutually exclusive flag. If that
other policy later adds the mutually exclusive flag the effect is
unclear.
If that's the case, then it is a bug in the specification of the "helo/
nohelo" option.
All the "op=" main spec should do about all this is advise designers of new
options to take care of specifying all the possible odd cases.
A strategy "each modifier (or option) defines its own rules" could result
in rare and hard to debug errors.
Well, that depends on the quality of individual new options' specifica-
tions.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFFqsbdwL7PKlBZWjsRAoBJAKDfkX18ZaqVpoI8lMu2YPTOg3Jt8wCeJ23y
8dNe0qhBpYSFK38yyfRud8E=
=950G
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=735