-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Dan_Mitton(_at_)notes(_dot_)ymp(_dot_)gov wrote:
Ok, that makes sense to me. However, there are a few examples in the
documentation that talk about doing checks in the exim acl_smtp_data acl
for the 'From:' header. I think someone needs to do some documentation
cleanup.
From the Mail::SPF::Query documentation in the examples/exim-acl :
spf_from_acl:
# Check header From:
warn set acl_m8 = ${address:$h_from:}
deny !acl = spf_check
warn message = Received-SPF: $acl_m8 ($acl_m7)
accept
In the Exim documentation in the doc/experimental-spec.txt :
You can now run SPF checks in incoming SMTP by using the "spf"
ACL condition in either the MAIL, RCPT or DATA ACLs.
OMG, you're right! Unless I misunderstand Exim's configuration syntax (I
don't have a clue about Exim), this is a gross mistake!
I will remove the relevant part from M:S:Q's examples/exim-acl for the
upcoming 2.000 release (which will still take another month or two, as it
will be a complete rewrite as a wrapper around the new Mail::SPF).
Can someone please contact the Exim people and tell them that SPF shouldn't
be used in "DATA ACLs"?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFFv8yvwL7PKlBZWjsRAoBRAJ4qwpKqt7cLKR6HCPS0VMCWGAMuWgCfRqux
PL/qF3iSWUqUzzORsgttmWI=
=lOmg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=735