-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Dan_Mitton(_at_)notes(_dot_)ymp(_dot_)gov wrote:
Yes, I agree. But if the HELO is something like:
HELO xyzzy
doesn't SPF return 'unknown'? There is nothing for it to lookup.
In that case it returns "none". Please have a look at the description of
the SPF result codes in the SPF specification:
http://www.openspf.org/RFC_4408#op-result
So this would "pass" the HELO test
No, not for any useful definition of "pass the HELO test" in the context of
SPF. It wouldn't fail the HELO SPF check, but it wouldn't pass it either.
The check would rather be inconclusive.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFFnaKawL7PKlBZWjsRAlBPAKDGtvtSbIeBL2lFqsui43b3wNa6jgCgrRJn
+wo2BdNQXXo95C8IqIBZEG8=
=fghd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=735