[spf-discuss] Changing the IPR nature of spf-discuss towards IETF's (was

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Frank Ellermann wrote:
> Okay, and here's the plan, I like to submit "SPF Discuss" as "other list"
> adding it to this page:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/nwg_list.cgi
spf-discuss does not match any of the entries in the "The following types 
of lists SHOULD be added:" list.  However that shouldn't let them stop us.  
What troubles me is the intellectual property issue.  I'd prefer us to be 
very, very conservative with changing the IPR nature of spf-discuss.  I'd 
like to learn what others think.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFGBk/1wL7PKlBZWjsRAs4JAJ9wkjzRLnpd2oA2/L+RzIrb7XfWggCfaQMS
FML0GMM6rvnuugRtp/HpcQQ=
=M09V
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=735