-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Frank Ellermann wrote:
Under "NOTE WELL" that situation changes to "told you so".
Sure, but the question is: do we _want_ to tell our subscribers that? I'm
feeling very reluctant.
I'd prefer us to be very, very conservative with changing the IPR
nature of spf-discuss.
Yes. My gut feeling is that it's minimally better than now, the IETF
trust has a lawyer, unlike say openspf.org - but actually openspf.org is
no legal entity, and the SPF discuss list is managed under listbox rules
with list owner Meng.
You wrote "changing the nature", do you have a clue what it _is_ at the
moment ?
Since no explicit agreement has been made, everyone has copyright on their
articles, probably with an implied license to redistribute. Everything
else (quoting, etc.) is covered by fair use.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFGBurdwL7PKlBZWjsRAphdAKDwv/a2jHm8stsYXrlIg3VcIFb7vwCfRlDc
uVEn366pnXXN3sn83hdFT4E=
=8ppL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=735