David MacQuigg wrote:
At 12:05 PM 1/17/2008 +0100, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
David MacQuigg wrote:
Maybe we could show direct relationships with == and
indirect relationships with ~~ and "same ADMD"
relationships as MTA1/MTA2. The situation we are
discussing is then illustrated as:
/ /====================\
Sender(s) ==> Transmitter --> / --> Receiver/Forwarder ~~> MDA ==> Recipient
/
Border (box67.com) (aol.com)
Thus, in case Robert's account at AOL provides for local
storage you would have written ~~> MDA/Recipient?
Or maybe ~~> MD Agent ==> MUA/Recipient -- MUA: Mail User
Agent - a program running on a Recipient's personal computer,
handling mail submission and retrieval.
[...]
Recipient, an individual in our discussions so far.
Ooops, you're right. I was thinking about his mail folders.
somewhere else you wrote:
Any mail forwarded by box67.com to that Recipient should
bypass all further filtering.
What if you relay (rather than forward) a message to Robert from
box67.com, using it as an outgoing mail server? Will the
extended trust still be operative in that case?
-------------------------------------------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org
Archives: http://v2.listbox.com/member/archive/735/=now
RSS Feed: http://v2.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/735/
Modify Your Subscription:
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=2183229&id_secret=87568528-0678b4
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com