spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF Internationalization

2008-04-15 23:02:36
Frank Ellermann wrote:
Okay, I guess <http://www.openspf.org/Modifier/exp>
could say a tiny bit more about this topic... ;-)

Thanx

[[ Personally I think exp= and %{l} are some of the
   two worst ideas in SPF, exists: and SOFTFAIL are
   also dubious.  Considering how many folks get mx
   wrong, while Doug invents DDoS scenarios based
   on mx and %{l}, I'm ready to add mx to the list,
   as long as RMX stays in the credits... ;-)      ]]

I may agree about the cosmetic nature of exp= and %{l}, but exists: is not dubious at all, as it enables complete control over authorized senders. For example, one could configure a server so as to automatically add a remote client's IP to various DNS records upon IP assignment, possibly including A, MX, and PTR besides accomplishing the exist: mechanism. That would allow to go along with the wishes of those folks who run an MTA on their laptops...

The rest of your note is rather puzzling... you must refer to the mx mechanism, not the mx record type, but why RMX?? You mean the old http://www.tools.ietf.org/html/draft-danisch-dns-rr-smtp-04 ?
BTW, that link in http://old.openspf.org/rfcs.html is broken.

What about changing the section title to something like
 == '''Why'''-service URL in Explanation modifiers

Which section, the remark in FAQ/I18N ?

I meant "SPF Internationalization". Actually both words in the current section title (the 2nd one in its abbreviated form) appear already in the titles hierarchically above that section, i.e. page and site.

 It can get
a link to Modifier/exp, and Modifier/exp can explain
the fine print of upper case macros with an example.

Great!

 [dummy vs. _spf labels]
It could be clarified in the text that it doesn't
have to be "_spf". There are chances that the string
exemplified is pasted in the zone file "as is"

Which string, dummy.your.domain.example ?  If an ISP
tries to use that as is it's no ISP, problem solved ;-)

Hmm... I regret I just canceled the quoting about oem&computer, otherwise I could mention that as a counter example ;-)

-------------------------------------------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org
Modify Your Subscription: http://www.listbox.com/member/
Archives: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/735/=now
RSS Feed: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/735/
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com