Thanks David,Stuart,Mike,kalyan
Sorted my problem out.
From: "Michael Kay" <michael(_dot_)h(_dot_)kay(_at_)ntlworld(_dot_)com>
Reply-To: xsl-list(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com
To: <xsl-list(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
Subject: RE: [xsl] generalized unique element
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 17:09:07 +0100
> Mike> It all gets easier in XPath 2.0, where you can write
> Mike>
> Mike> <xsl:if test="every $x in preceding-sibling::*
> Mike> satisfies name($x) != name(.)">
>
> Are you _sure_ that's easier than
>
> <xsl:if test="preceding-sibling::*[name(.)=name(current())]">
>
Well, I can't say it's a simpler solution; but in my case, this
afternoon, it was a solution that I found more easily.
Michael Kay
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
_________________________________________________________________
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list