RE: generalized unique element2002-09-11 09:09:07Mike> It all gets easier in XPath 2.0, where you can write Mike> Mike> <xsl:if test="every $x in preceding-sibling::* Mike> satisfies name($x) != name(.)"> Are you _sure_ that's easier than <xsl:if test="preceding-sibling::*[name(.)=name(current())]"> Well, I can't say it's a simpler solution; but in my case, this afternoon, it was a solution that I found more easily. Michael Kay XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
|