Mike> It all gets easier in XPath 2.0, where you can write
Mike>
Mike> <xsl:if test="every $x in preceding-sibling::*
Mike> satisfies name($x) != name(.)">
Are you _sure_ that's easier than
<xsl:if test="preceding-sibling::*[name(.)=name(current())]">
(it gets more useful in nested contexts where current() doesn't do the
right thing)
David
_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list