I just tried to google 'xpath 2 relax ng schema' and did not come up with
anything meaningfull, so i would like to display my ignorance and ask - why use
W3C Shema? I assume becuase RNG came out later. Is there any interoperability
between the two different schema languages(?) in XPath 2? If I like RNG, will I
be able to use that in/for/with(?) XPath2?
I guess, I mean why use W3 Schema when Relax NG is so nice, simple, clean and
well documented? I like the idea of using schemas in XSL/XPath, but not if it is
W3C Schema.
befuddled,
-Rob
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-xsl-list(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com
[mailto:owner-xsl-list(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com]On Behalf Of
G. Ken Holman
Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 6:14 AM
As has been said it would be very nice to have some of the additional
features and functionalities to make working with XML easier than some of
the gyrations necessary for concurred limitations of XPath 1.0 ... but not
at the expense of the encumbrances of W3C Schema.
XPath 1.0 was based on XML and Namespaces ... XPath 2.0 is not: it is based
on W3C Schema. Why can we not have an XPath 2.0 based on XML and then some
W3C Schema thingy or W3C Query thingy that is based on the PSVI?
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list