They won't need to, all they have to do is to open ie and have a page
like:
<disc letter="C" type="HD">
<folder name="Documents and Settings">
<folder name="..">
...
</folder>
...
</folder>
<folder name="Program Files">
...
</folder>
...
</disc>
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-xsl-list(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com
[mailto:owner-xsl-list(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com] On Behalf Of
Martinez,
Brian
Sent: terça-feira, 21 de Janeiro de 2003 21:27
To: 'xsl-list(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com'
Subject: RE: [xsl] Max size?
From: J.Pietschmann [mailto:j3322ptm(_at_)yahoo(_dot_)de]
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 1:57 PM
Subject: Re: [xsl] Max size?
Michael Kay wrote:
In the longer term I'm sure we will see XSLT processors
that access XML
databases natively rather than relying on the input tree being in
primary memory: this is one reason why the synergy between XSLT and
XQuery is so important.
The next version of MS Windows will have an RDBMS based file system.
Your note raises the interesting perspective that in some years OS
might use mixed XML/RDBMS natively instead of a classic file system
for storing all kinds of information, in particular mail, documents,
spreadsheets and presentations.
What opportunities would arise from this? Would the benefits outweight
the cost?
I can envision the help desk calls already:
"I'm sorry, ma'am, you can't just type 'dir' anymore, you have to use
'saxon -o STD_OUT c:\ dir.xslt'"
;-)
b.
| brian martinez
brian(_dot_)martinez(_at_)trip(_dot_)com |
| senior gui programmer 303.708.7248 |
| trip network, inc. fax 303.790.9350 |
| 6436 s. racine cir. englewood, co 80111 |
| http://www.cheaptickets.com/ http://www.trip.com/ |
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list