At 30 May 2003 17:10 G. Ken Holman wrote:
I disagree ... my understanding is that the *only* restriction of top-level
constructs is that <xsl:import/> be before all other top-level instructions
or non-FO-namespace elements.
yup,admittedly I was more stating a style convention then an XSLT spec
thing....and I won't argue the style point........
though there is slight ambiguity in the XSLT spec, in relation to processing of
cdata-section-elements as defined in xsl:output....this is yet another very
rare case that I wont get into.
have a nice weekend, finally we have some nice hot weather in the north of
england !
( pint being handed to all ), Jim Fuller
This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If
you are not the intended recipient please contact the sender immediately. Any
disclosure, copying, distribution or any other use of this communication is
strictly prohibitedand may be unlawful. Stuart Lawrence Marketing
Communications Limited reserves the right to monitor and intercept
communications for unlawful business purposes.
This also confirms that this message has been swept for viruses, although
Stuart Lawrence Marketing Communications Limited accepts no responsibility for
any loss or damage resulting directly or indirectly from the use of this email
or contents.
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list