If you're tied to MSXML 4.0 -- or even to MS XSLT processing more generally
-- you certainly don't need to worry about XSLT 2.0:
http://www.biglist.com/lists/xsl-list/archives/200307/msg00728.html
Ed Blachman
Trellix Corporation
-----Original Message-----
From: kakridge(_at_)bellsouth(_dot_)net
[mailto:kakridge(_at_)bellsouth(_dot_)net]
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 10:21 AM
To: xsl-list(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com
Subject: RE: [xsl] XSL Tool
Just to clarify, I must use the MSXSL 4.0 (parser?). Still pretty new
to this. Not sure if that changes anything.
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-xsl-list(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com
[mailto:owner-xsl-list(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com] On Behalf Of
Andrew Welch
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 10:03 AM
To: xsl-list(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com
Subject: RE: [xsl] XSL Tool
You can use saxon in xselerator, just search for 'saxon' in the help
index for the settings.
I'm just curious about what tool to use for creating XSL. I
am currently using Xselerator from MarrowSoft. It seems that
it only supports XSL v1.0. I understand there is also XSL
2.0? What tool can I get for the $200 range.
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list