Here's the output the algorithm is dictating (and ideally,
if not a huge hassle, I want):
:71-72
:100-104
:200-204
:101-8
:321-28
:1087-89
I'm not sure I'd even chase such an irregular lot Bruce!
:200-204
yet
:101-8
and
:321-28
Somewhat illogical?
I've always been suspicious of people recommending
the Chicago manual of style.
there's a whole bunch of reasons!
regards DaveP
--
DISCLAIMER:
NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is
confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the intended
recipient you should not use, disclose, distribute or copy any of the
content of it or of any attachment; you are requested to notify the
sender immediately of your receipt of the email and then to delete it
and any attachments from your system.
RNIB endeavours to ensure that emails and any attachments generated by
its staff are free from viruses or other contaminants. However, it
cannot accept any responsibility for any such which are transmitted.
We therefore recommend you scan all attachments.
Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email and
any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
those of RNIB.
RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227
Website: http://www.rnib.org.uk