RE: XSLT 2.0 *and* XSLT 1.0 validation -- how to?

I wonder if there are XSLT 1.0 programmers, who find this mixed
language feature useful?


Mixing 1.0 modules and 2.0 modules is definitely needed, so that one can
include library code that hasn't been converted.

I'm less convinced by finer-grained controls. If it hadn't already been
there (on LREs) in 1.0, I doubt we would have added it.

Michael Kay

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
*xslt intellisense in vs [was: Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 and* XSLT 1.0 validation -- how to?]*, (continued)* *xslt intellisense in vs [was: Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 and* XSLT 1.0 validation -- how to?]*, Jan Limpens* *Re: XSLT 2.0 and* XSLT 1.0 validation -- how to?*, Jeni Tennison* *Re: XSLT 2.0 and* XSLT 1.0 validation -- how to?*, Dimtre Novatchev* *Re: XSLT 2.0 and* XSLT 1.0 validation -- how to?*, Bruce D'Arcus* *Re: XSLT 2.0 and* XSLT 1.0 validation -- how to?*, Colin Paul Adams* *Re: XSLT 2.0 and* XSLT 1.0 validation -- how to?*, Bruce D'Arcus* *Re: XSLT 2.0 and* XSLT 1.0 validation -- how to?*, David Carlisle* *Re: XSLT 2.0 and* XSLT 1.0 validation -- how to?*, Bruce D'Arcus* *Re: XSLT 2.0 and* XSLT 1.0 validation -- how to?*, David Carlisle* *Re: XSLT 2.0 and* XSLT 1.0 validation -- how to?*, Dimtre Novatchev* *RE: XSLT 2.0 and* XSLT 1.0 validation -- how to?*, Michael Kay* <= *RE: XSLT 2.0 and* XSLT 1.0 validation -- how to?*, Michael Kay* *Re: XSLT 2.0 and* XSLT 1.0 validation -- how to?*, Emmanouil Batsis* *RE: XSLT 2.0 and* XSLT 1.0 validation -- how to?*, Michael Kay* *RE: XSLT 2.0 and* XSLT 1.0 validation -- how to?*, Michael Kay* *RE: XSLT 2.0 and* XSLT 1.0 validation -- how to?*, Rod Humphris - FLPTN* *RE: RE: XSLT 2.0 and* XSLT 1.0 validation -- how to?*, cknell* *Re: XSLT 2.0 and* XSLT 1.0 validation -- how to?*, Richard Tobin* *RE: XSLT 2.0 and* XSLT 1.0 validation -- how to?*, Pawson, David* *RE: XSLT 2.0 and* XSLT 1.0 validation -- how to?*, Michael Kay* *RE: XSLT 2.0 and* XSLT 1.0 validation -- how to?*, Pawson, David*