Re: XSLT 2.0 *and* XSLT 1.0 validation -- how to?

Dimtre Novatchev wrote:

Was this
an intentional effort of the XSLT 2.0 WG and why?

XSLT 2.0 "Must Maintain Backwards Compatibility with XSLT 1.1" so isuppose having the same namespace would make it's adoption easier bymaking it work on existing processors (at least when using the 1.1compatible subset of features).


BTW, Still waiting on that question re XPV :-(

Cheers,

Manos

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
*Re: XSLT 2.0 and* XSLT 1.0 validation -- how to?*, (continued)* *Re: XSLT 2.0 and* XSLT 1.0 validation -- how to?*, Dimtre Novatchev* *Re: XSLT 2.0 and* XSLT 1.0 validation -- how to?*, Bruce D'Arcus* *Re: XSLT 2.0 and* XSLT 1.0 validation -- how to?*, Colin Paul Adams* *Re: XSLT 2.0 and* XSLT 1.0 validation -- how to?*, Bruce D'Arcus* *Re: XSLT 2.0 and* XSLT 1.0 validation -- how to?*, David Carlisle* *Re: XSLT 2.0 and* XSLT 1.0 validation -- how to?*, Bruce D'Arcus* *Re: XSLT 2.0 and* XSLT 1.0 validation -- how to?*, David Carlisle* *Re: XSLT 2.0 and* XSLT 1.0 validation -- how to?*, Dimtre Novatchev* *RE: XSLT 2.0 and* XSLT 1.0 validation -- how to?*, Michael Kay* *RE: XSLT 2.0 and* XSLT 1.0 validation -- how to?*, Michael Kay* *Re: XSLT 2.0 and* XSLT 1.0 validation -- how to?*, Emmanouil Batsis* <= *RE: XSLT 2.0 and* XSLT 1.0 validation -- how to?*, Michael Kay* *RE: XSLT 2.0 and* XSLT 1.0 validation -- how to?*, Michael Kay* *RE: XSLT 2.0 and* XSLT 1.0 validation -- how to?*, Rod Humphris - FLPTN* *RE: RE: XSLT 2.0 and* XSLT 1.0 validation -- how to?*, cknell* *Re: XSLT 2.0 and* XSLT 1.0 validation -- how to?*, Richard Tobin* *RE: XSLT 2.0 and* XSLT 1.0 validation -- how to?*, Pawson, David* *RE: XSLT 2.0 and* XSLT 1.0 validation -- how to?*, Michael Kay* *RE: XSLT 2.0 and* XSLT 1.0 validation -- how to?*, Pawson, David* *Re: XSLT 2.0 and* XSLT 1.0 validation -- how to?*, David Carlisle* *RE: XSLT 2.0 and* XSLT 1.0 validation -- how to?*, Michael Kay*