Re: xslt 2.0 and alternatives?

Bruce D'Arcus wrote:

So that means XQP will be such a project? I got confused because youwrote ".NET platform"; but it sounds like you're just intending to writea processor in C#?

Well, actually .NET is a platform name (aka CLI, not to be confused withMicrosoft .NET) and Mono as well as dotGNU are also .NETimplementations, e.g. see http://www.mono-project.com/about/index.html.

And yes, the programming language is C#.
--
Oleg Tkachenko
http://blog.tkachenko.com
Multiconn Technologies, Israel

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: xslt 2.0 and alternatives?, (continued) Re: xslt 2.0 and alternatives?, M. David Peterson Re: xslt 2.0 and alternatives?, Marcus Andersson Re: xslt 2.0 and alternatives?, Colin Paul Adams Re: xslt 2.0 and alternatives?, M. David Peterson Re: xslt 2.0 and alternatives?, Bruce D'Arcus Re: xslt 2.0 and alternatives?, Colin Paul Adams Re: xslt 2.0 and alternatives?, Bruce D'Arcus Re: xslt 2.0 and alternatives?, Colin Paul Adams Re: xslt 2.0 and alternatives?, Oleg Tkachenko Re: xslt 2.0 and alternatives?, Bruce D'Arcus Re: xslt 2.0 and alternatives?, Oleg Tkachenko <= Seeking XSL projects in Charlotte NC, Marty McKeever Re: xslt 2.0 and alternatives?, Marcus Andersson RE: xslt 2.0 and alternatives?, Pieter Reint Siegers Kort

Previous by Date:	trasformation of a Word Document, marinabortolotti\(_at_)libero\(_dot_)it
Next by Date:	RE: trasformation of a Word Document, Lincoln Mitchell
Previous by Thread:	Re: xslt 2.0 and alternatives?, Bruce D'Arcus
Next by Thread:	Seeking XSL projects in Charlotte NC, Marty McKeever
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]