xsl-list
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Looking for a shorter mapping expression

2004-12-05 04:07:40
On Sun, 5 Dec 2004 01:50:14 -0700, M. David Peterson
<m(_dot_)david(_dot_)x2x2x(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com> wrote:
Dimitre,

took me a sec to realize you were refering to page 208 in his XPath
book...  I reread the XSLT 2.0 page 208 several times before I
realized "xpath expression = xpath book" :)  I'm with you now...

:o)

I find that there's one book on XPath2 now -- the book.


Are you refering to the fact an error is returned if E2 does not
return a sequence of nodes?  I guess that doesnt really make a lot of
sense given the above... but does this same rule apply when "/" is
used an an operand instead of a path expression?

No, E2 is allowed to return a sequence of atomic values (not nodes) if
it is the last step in the path expression.

I am referring to the fact that in this case the result is allowed to
be either a sequence of nodes or (exclusive or) a sequence of atomic
values, but not a mixture of the two.

I'm asking again: why?

Cheers,
Dimitre.

--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--