"Dimtre" == Dimtre Novatchev <dnovatchev(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com> writes:
Dimtre> Because, according to the XPath 2.0 spec: "only the last
Dimtre> step in a path is allowed to return a sequence of atomic
Dimtre> values."
Dimtre> http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath20/#id-path-expressions
Ah, yes, of course. As usual, I stopped reading too early.
Dimtre> <xsl:sequence select= "for $this in $pList1 return
Dimtre> f:apply($pFun, $this)" />
Well, if u want something more compact (why?)?
for $t in $pList return f:apply ($pFun, $t)
:-)
Still not compact enough?
How about:
f:apply-2 ($pFun, $pList)
:-) :-)
<xsl:function name="f:apply-2">
<xsl:param name="pFunc" as="element()"/>
<xsl:param name="arg1"/>
<xsl:sequence select="for $t in $arg1 return f:apply ($pFun, $t)" />
</xsl:function>
Still not compact enough?
How about:
f:a ($pFun, $pList)
:-) :-) :-)
I don't understand the compactness requirement.
--
Colin Paul Adams
Preston Lancashire
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--